Response from Autosport’s Editor

Following the Mark Hughes, Lewis Hamiliton and a load of tweets article we published October 31, 2012, we sent a letter of complaint to Autosport’s Editor Charles Bradley and the board of Haymarket Media Group.

Here we share the response and so called ‘evidence’ – a screen grab of Lewis Hamiliton’s tweets –  sent with the email.

::

Dear Stephanie,

Thank you for your email.

I completely refute your accusation that Mark Hughes¹s column, page 19, dated September 13 (not 12 as you state), 2012, is ³acutely racist².

In his opinion column, Mark quite clearly created a fictitious dialogue between caricatures of Lewis Hamilton and his future team boss at Mercedes, Ross Brawn.

To state that the quoted speech of Lewis ³has no relation² to the tweets that Hamilton posted on his feed is frankly inaccurate. In the weeks leading up to Mark¹s column, Lewis regularly used street culture phrases such as ³mofo², ³lol², ³chillin², ³WTF² etc (see attached screengrab). This is what the Lewis character¹s vernacular is based upon, not because of the colour of his skin.

Mark¹s column was intended to highlight, in an exaggerated fashion, the culture differences between the Œold-school Etonian¹ Ross Brawn and bright, young British F1 star Lewis, by the latter using similar street culture vernacular to his tweets.

I¹m not sure how acquainted you are with the intricacies of Formula 1, but in the article the Lewis character¹s observations were, in fact, highly insightful and answered every single issue that the Brawn character, who showed absolutely zero negativity towards the Lewis character¹s responses.
Lewis was in no way portrayed as the Œlesser¹ of the two; their conversation is very much peer-to-peer.

As one of the most respected journalists in the paddock, Mark deals with both Lewis and Ross on an almost day-to-day basis, certainly on grand prix weekends. He is Lewis¹s unofficial biographer, and informs me that both have read this column and that neither of them had a problem with it. I have written about Lewis¹s racing, from karting to F1, and would never allow a piece about him to be published in my magazine of a racist nature.

I hope this response clarifies our position, and I can further assure you that content of a racist nature will never appear in the pages of Autosport.

Yours sincerely,
Charles Bradley,
Editor
AUTOSPORT magazine

0 responses to “Response from Autosport’s Editor”

  1. The fact that Charles Bradley supports the exaggeration and therefore fabrication of Mark Hughes’ article depicting Lewis Hamilton’s mode of communication via text messaging as the norm reveals his ignorance and racism. Bradley seems to have no problem aiding and abetting Mark Hughes’ racism which serves only to embed in our collective psyches the stereotype of how individuals of the African Diaspora speak and act. While he may have convinced himself that what he is saying about Lewis Hamilton is not racist – just as all but one Republican in the U.S. convinced themselves that no one could see their racism (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4iIOpkiJoOI), we see, we response (or not) and we move onward and upward – cheering on the Lewis Hamilton’s of the African Diaspora despite the hate.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *